
The proteins processed by the secretory pathway (secretome) are critical players in the development of multi-cellular eukaryotic organisms but have yet to be comprehensively studied at the genomic level. In this study, we use the Target P algorithm to predict human (13-20% of proteins found in individual datasets) and Fugu (14%) secretomes based on analysis of their nearly complete proteomes. We combine internal processing with prediction software to automate secreted protein identification and overcome one of the major challenges associated with EST data: identification of the minority of clones that encode N-terminally-complete proteins. We discuss the use of these methods to predict secreted proteins in EST-based consensus sequence sets, and we validate these predictions using an assay for cell-free cotranslational translocation. Analysis of TIGR Porcine Gene Index 4.0 as a test dataset resulted in the identification of 352 N-terminally-complete, putative secreted proteins. In functional agreement with our predictions, 34 of 40 (85%) of these cDNAs were verified to be cotranslationally translocated in an in vitro translation system. The methods developed here are specifically designed to accept partial open reading frames and improve secreted protein predictions in eukaryotic transcriptomes, and are valuable for the analysis and annotation of eukaryotic EST databases.
Expressed Sequence Tags, Proteome, Swine, Tetraodontiformes, Molecular Sequence Data, Protein Sorting Signals, Protein Transport, Eukaryotic Cells, Sequence Analysis, Protein, Protein Biosynthesis, Databases, Genetic, Animals, Humans, Amino Acid Sequence, Sequence Alignment, Algorithms
Expressed Sequence Tags, Proteome, Swine, Tetraodontiformes, Molecular Sequence Data, Protein Sorting Signals, Protein Transport, Eukaryotic Cells, Sequence Analysis, Protein, Protein Biosynthesis, Databases, Genetic, Animals, Humans, Amino Acid Sequence, Sequence Alignment, Algorithms
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 39 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
