
We have developed a system to identify highly specific antibody-antigen interactions by protein array screening. This removes the need for selection using animal immunisation or in vitro techniques such as phage or ribosome display. We screened an array of 27 648 human foetal brain proteins with 12 well-expressed antibody fragments that had not previously been exposed to any antigen. Four highly specific antibody-antigen pairs were identified, including three antibodies that bind proteins of unknown function. The target proteins were expressed at a very low copy number on the array, emphasising the unbiased nature of the screen. The specificity and sensitivity of binding demonstrates that this 'naive' screening approach could be applied to the high throughput isolation of specific antibodies against many different targets in the human proteome.
DNA, Complementary, Proteome, Blotting, Western, Molecular Sequence Data, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Antibodies, Recombinant Proteins, Antigen-Antibody Reactions, Antibody Specificity, Peptide Library, Humans, Immunoglobulin Fragments
DNA, Complementary, Proteome, Blotting, Western, Molecular Sequence Data, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Antibodies, Recombinant Proteins, Antigen-Antibody Reactions, Antibody Specificity, Peptide Library, Humans, Immunoglobulin Fragments
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 105 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
