
Various strategies employed in genomic DNA cloning by subtractive hybridization have been examined by computer simulations, with the comparison between the predictions and the published results. The result shows that the efficiency of target sequence enrichment and the sensitivity to experimental conditions depend strongly on the enrichment strategy employed. The strategy selecting only tester/tester after hybridization can be very efficient to enrich targets. For successful target enrichment, however, the strategy requires a highly efficient subtraction method and proper hybridization conditions. The strategy also requires that the selected DNA be amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) after each or each alternate subtraction. By contrast, the strategy selecting tester/tester plus single-stranded tester is less sensitive to various experimental factors, compared with the strategy selecting only tester/tester. However, it is not as efficient. With this strategy, the tester DNA selected may or may not be amplified by PCR before the next round. In the case of the strategy selecting single-stranded tester, the target DNA can be successfully enriched only when the selected DNA is directly used without PCR amplification in the next round. The strong features of existing methods can be combined to develop a protocol that is more efficient and more reliable.
Genome, Models, Genetic, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Nucleic Acid Hybridization, Computer Simulation, DNA, Cloning, Molecular, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Software
Genome, Models, Genetic, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Nucleic Acid Hybridization, Computer Simulation, DNA, Cloning, Molecular, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Software
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
