
We have examined codon bias in 207 plant gene sequences collected from Genbank and the literature. When this sample was further divided into 53 monocot and 154 dicot genes, the pattern of relative use of synonymous codons was shown to differ between these taxonomic groups, primarily in the use of G + C in the degenerate third base. Maize and soybean codon bias were examined separately and followed the monocot and dicot codon usage patterns respectively. Codon preference in ribulose 1,5 bisphosphate and chlorophyll a/b binding protein, two of the most abundant proteins in leaves was investigated. These highly expressed are more restricted in their codon usage than plant genes in general.
Chlorophyll, Base Composition, Base Sequence, Glycine max, Photosynthetic Reaction Center Complex Proteins, Light-Harvesting Protein Complexes, Zea mays, Ribulosephosphates, Species Specificity, Amino Acid Sequence, RNA, Messenger, Periodicals as Topic, Codon, Information Systems, Plant Proteins
Chlorophyll, Base Composition, Base Sequence, Glycine max, Photosynthetic Reaction Center Complex Proteins, Light-Harvesting Protein Complexes, Zea mays, Ribulosephosphates, Species Specificity, Amino Acid Sequence, RNA, Messenger, Periodicals as Topic, Codon, Information Systems, Plant Proteins
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 273 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
