
pmid: 37749711
AbstractThe use of soft X-rays in electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) has gained renewed interest over the past decades due to the advent of new detector technologies. Because X-ray absorption is the dominant correction for soft X-rays, a reliable set of mass attenuation coefficients (MACs) is needed for accurate composition determination. Although several MAC tabulations cover the soft X-ray range, the accuracy of such tabulations below 1 keV is not firmly established. In this study, we assess the accuracy of MAC tabulations in the soft X-ray region by comparing tabulated values for Be, B, C, N, O, and F Kα X-rays with experimental data available in the literature. We find that the 1993 semi-empirical MAC compilation of Henke et al. [(1993). Low-energy X-ray interaction coefficients: Photoabsorption, scattering, transmission and reflection at E=50−30000 eV, Z=1−92. Atom Data Nucl Data Tables54, 181–342] and the more recent theoretical MAC calculations of Sabbatucci and Salvat [(2016). Theory and calculation of the atomic photoeffect. Rad Phys Chem121, 122–140] perform slightly better than the rest of the considered tabulations. The Sabbatucci–Salvat dataset also provides the best agreement with the few existing experimental measurements for Al L2,3M X-rays.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
