
Unification grammars (UG) are a grammatical formalism that underlies several contemporary linguistic theories, including Lexical-functional Grammar and Head-driven Phrase-structure Grammar. UG is an especially attractive formalism because of its expressivity, which facilitates the expression of complex linguistic structures and relations. Formally, UG is Turing-complete, generating the entire class of recursively enumerable languages. This expressivity, however, comes at a price: the universal recognition problem is undecidable for arbitrary unification grammars. We define a constrained version of UG that guarantees efficient processing, while allowing the expression of complex linguistic structures. We do so by proving that the constrained formalism is equivalent to Range Concatenation Grammar, a formalism that generates exactly the class of languages recognizable in deterministic polynomial time. We thus obtain a grammatical formalism that is on one hand highly expressive, and on the other efficient to compute with.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
