Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao zbMATH Openarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
zbMATH Open
Article . 1999
Data sources: zbMATH Open
Journal of Logic and Computation
Article . 1999 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
DBLP
Article . 1999
Data sources: DBLP
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

Complexity of products of modal logics

Authors: Maarten Marx;

Complexity of products of modal logics

Abstract

A product of Kripke frames is the product of their underlying sets with the original relations preserved along the corresponding coordinates. Products of frames and products of logics were introduced by the reviewer [Math. Notes 23, 417-424 (1978); translation from Mat. Zametki 23, 759-772 (1978; Zbl 0384.03010)] and intensively studied recently [cf. \textit{D. Gabbay} and \textit{V. Shehtman}, Log. J. IGPL 6, 73-146 (1998; Zbl 0902.03008); ibid. 8, 165-210 (2000) for further references]. The paper proves several non-trivial results on complexity of product logics. All lower bounds are obtained by tiling arguments. It is shown that the product of every two logics among K, D, T, K4, S4, S5 has a NEXPTIME-hard satisfaction problem. The situation with upper bounds within the same set of product logics is more difficult. In some cases (e.g. for \(\text{K}\times \text{K}\), \(\text{K}\times \text{K}4\)) only Kalmar non-elementary upper bounds are known [\textit{D. Gabbay} and \textit{V. Shehtman} (1998), loc. cit.; \textit{F. Wolter}, ``The product of converse PDL and polymodal K'', J. Log. Comput. 10, No. 2, 223-251 (2000)]. All these logics are known to be RE [cf. \textit{D. Gabbay} and \textit{V. Shehtman} (1998), loc. cit.], and decidability remains an open problem for some of them (e.g. for \(\text{K4}\times \text{K4}\)). However, the paper proves that the satisfaction problem in \(\text{S5}\times \text{K}\) is NEXPTIME-complete; for \(\text{S5}\times \text{S5}\) this follows from a paper of \textit{E. Grädel, P. Kolaitis} and \textit{M. Vardi} [Bull. Symb. Log. 3, 53-69 (1997; Zbl 0873.03009)]. It is also proved that for any complete monomodal logic L, the products \(\text{L}\times \text{Alt}_1\), \(\text{L}\times \text{SL}\) (where \(\text{Alt}_1= \text{K} +\neg p\rightarrow\neg p\), \(\text{SL}= \text{K}+\neg p\leftrightarrow\neg p\)) have the same complexity as L. On the other hand, it is shown that the global satisfaction problem, i.e. the problem whether a given formula is globally true in some model over an L-frame, is undecidable if L is a product logic, such as \(\text{Alt}_1^2\), \(\text{K}^2\) etc.

Country
Netherlands
Keywords

Complexity of computation (including implicit computational complexity), global satisfaction problem, product of Kripke frames, product of modal logics, lower bounds, upper bounds, tiling, complexity, Modal logic (including the logic of norms), modal logic, satisfaction problem

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    30
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
30
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!