
Abstract Do foresters often use larger field plots than they really need for cruising timber? Tests in two important forest types indicate that they do. Relative efficiencies of BAF-10 point-samples versus five sizes of circular plots were studied in the Georgia Piedmont. Inventories were made in stands of bottomland hardwoods and loblolly-shortleaf pines. For the hardwood tract, point-samples and 1/10-acre plots provided the most efficient volume estimates, i.e., the greatest precision for the least cost or amount of field time required. In cruising pines, 1/20-acre and 1/10-acre plots ranked highest in relative efficiency.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
