
The most useful and appropriate methods for assessing the bioavailability of (nonheme) iron supplements are described. When the supplement can be labeled isotopically, the best method for measuring bioavailability is hemoglobin incorporation, followed by fecal monitoring. Caco-2 cell in vitro systems can be used for rapid screening to predict potential availability for absorption. If the compound cannot be labeled, then the plasma appearance/disappearance of oral iron given together with an intravenous dose of iron isotope can be used to quantify absorption. With oral doses in excess of 25 mg, the 4- to 6-h plasma concentration can provide a qualitative assessment of bioavailability. Approaches for normalizing results to minimize intraindividual and interindividual variability in efficiency of iron absorption are discussed.
Erythrocyte Indices, Iron Radioisotopes, Iron, Transferrin, Biological Availability, Nutritional Status, Protoporphyrins, Iron Deficiencies, Diet, Feces, Hemoglobins, Isotopes, Risk Factors, 615, Dietary Supplements, Humans
Erythrocyte Indices, Iron Radioisotopes, Iron, Transferrin, Biological Availability, Nutritional Status, Protoporphyrins, Iron Deficiencies, Diet, Feces, Hemoglobins, Isotopes, Risk Factors, 615, Dietary Supplements, Humans
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 41 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
