Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Journal of Economic ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Journal of Economic Entomology
Article . 2018 . Peer-reviewed
License: OUP Standard Publication Reuse
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Repellency and Laboratory Performance of Selected Insecticides to Field-Collected Insecticide Resistant German Cockroaches (Blattodea: Ectobiidae)

Authors: Xiaoyan, Wu; Arthur G, Appel;

Repellency and Laboratory Performance of Selected Insecticides to Field-Collected Insecticide Resistant German Cockroaches (Blattodea: Ectobiidae)

Abstract

German cockroaches, Blattella germanica (L.) (Blattodea: Ectobiidae), are important indoor insect pests and remain difficult to control because of their ability to develop resistance to insecticides. The toxicity, resistance levels, repellency, and performance index (PI) value of five formulated insecticides (permethrin, chlorpyrifos, propoxur, imidacloprid, and fipronil) were determined for adult males of seven strains of the German cockroach: a laboratory-reared susceptible strain (S) and six field-collected strains (B, D, E, G, H, and I). Propoxur was generally the most toxic insecticide to all strains using continuous exposure methods; however, using Ebeling choice box methods, chlorpyrifos, and fipronil were most toxic. In both continuous exposure and Ebeling choice box tests, the field-collected strains were generally most resistant to permethrin among the five insecticides. The greatest increase in resistance ratios between the two exposure methods was for permethrin and propoxur. Permethrin was the most repellent insecticide against all but two strains (D and H). PI values reached 100 (no repellency and complete mortality) for the susceptible strain against only chlorpyrifos and fipronil. Only fipronil resulted in a PI value of 100 for any of the field-collected strains. Continuous exposure and Ebeling choice box resistance ratios were correlated, and both were correlated with previously reported resistance ratios (based on LD50 values). Choice box repellency, however, was only correlated with LD50 resistance ratios. PIMax was negatively correlated with all measures of resistance ratios.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Insecticides, Insect Repellents, Toxicity Tests, Animals, Female, Blattellidae

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    6
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
6
Top 10%
Average
Average
hybrid