Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Does Background Odor in Tea Gardens Mask Attractants? Screening and Application of Attractants for Empoasca onukii Matsuda

Authors: Xiuxiu, Xu; Xiaoming, Cai; Lei, Bian; Zongxiu, Luo; Zhaoqun, Li; Zongmao, Chen;

Does Background Odor in Tea Gardens Mask Attractants? Screening and Application of Attractants for Empoasca onukii Matsuda

Abstract

Plant volatiles help herbivores to locate their hosts, and therefore, they could be used to help develop pesticide-free pest management strategies. To develop an attractant for tea leafhopper (Empoasca onukii), we screened nine tea plant volatile compounds for their attractiveness using Y-tube olfactometer assays. Results indicated that tea leafhoppers significantly preferred ocimene, limonene, (Z)-3-hexenol, and (Z)-3-hexenyl acetate over clean air. These compounds were combined in a blend which lost its attractiveness at concentrations below 10-2 g/ml in liquid paraffin. In field tests, the blend was attractive to leafhoppers only in autumn, but not in summer. Analyses of the tea field background odor showed that all four components of the blend were present at much higher concentrations in summer (0.05-0.001 ng/liter) than in autumn (~10- to 25-fold lower). In field Y-tube bioassays, compared with the tea field background odor, the blend was attractive at a concentration of 10-1 g/ml in liquid paraffin, but not at 10-2 g/ml. These results suggest that field background odor can disrupt the attractiveness of an attractant based on plant volatiles to herbivores.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, China, Volatile Organic Compounds, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Chemotaxis, Camellia sinensis, Pheromones, Hemiptera, Odorants, Animals, Female

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    25
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
25
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!