Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Within-Root Mortality of Cylas formicarius (Coleoptera: Apionidae) by Entomopathogenic Nematodes

Authors: Catharine M. Mannion; Richard K. Jansson;

Within-Root Mortality of Cylas formicarius (Coleoptera: Apionidae) by Entomopathogenic Nematodes

Abstract

Within-root mortality of sweetpotato weevil, Cylas formicarius (F.), by six strains of entomopathogenic nematodes in the families Steinernematidae and Heterorhabditidae ( Steinernema carpocapsae \[Weiser\] \[= Neoaplectana carpocapsae, Steinemema Feltiae \] All and Mexican strains; Steinernema feltiae \[Filipjev\] \[= Steinemema bibionis \] N-27 strain; Steinernema glaseri [Steiner]; Heterorhabditis bacteriophora Poinar [= Heterorhabditis heliothidis] HP88 strain; and Heterorhabditis sp. FL2122 strain [an un-described nematode isolated in Florida]) was tested in several buried-root bioassays. The ability of nematodes to locate and kill weevils, and the location within the root where infection occurred, were measured. In addition, mortality of the weevils in roots that were artificially infested in the laboratory was compared with mortality in naturally infested roots from the field using two concentrations of one nematode ( s. carpocapsae Mexican strain). In general, the heterorhabditid nematodes caused higher levels of mortality within the root than the steinernematids. Heterorhabditis sp. FL2122 strain killed the highest proportion of weevils in the shortest period of time. Similar differences among nematodes were seen in the inner portion (½ radius) of the storage roots, as well as ill the outer portion. Although weevil mortality in the artificially infested roots was greater than in the naturally infested roots, the trends in mortality were similar; we observed increased mortality in the nematode treatments compared with the control and no difference in mortality between the two nematode concentrations.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!