Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Comparison of Eleven Soil Termiticides Against the Formosan Subterranean Termite and Eastern Subterranean Termite (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae)

Authors: Nan-Yao Su; Rudolf H. Scheffrahn;

Comparison of Eleven Soil Termiticides Against the Formosan Subterranean Termite and Eastern Subterranean Termite (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae)

Abstract

Toxicities of 11 topically applied termiticides to the Formosan subterranean termite, Coptotermes formosanus Shiraki, and the eastern subterranean termite, Reticulitermes flavipes (Kollar) were determined. At LD50, deltamethrin was most toxic (0.12 and 0.01 μg/g for C. Formosan us and R. fiavipes , respectively), while chlordane was least toxic (LD50:45.34 and 20.10 μg/g, respectively). R. flavipes was more susceptible to all termiticides than C. formosanus . The relative susceptibility of the two termite species ( C. formosanus LD50÷ R. fiavipes LD50) ranged from 2.0 (chlorpyrifos) to 12.9 (bifenthrin). In a tunneling test in which termites were given a choice of penetrating or avoiding treated soil, all nine pyrethroids tested were repellent at sublethal doses. At appropriate concentrations, termites did not penetrate soil treated with pyrethroids and did not contact the toxicant. Significant mortality was mostly observed as termites tunneled through deposits of chlordane and chlorpyrifos and were killed by constant exposure. Soil treated with chlordane was most vulnerable to termite tunneling activity. Both termite species penetrated the 5 cm soil treated with 10 ppm of chlordane. Tunneling was inhibited with both species in soil treated with 1 ppm permethrin, while deltamethrin and cyhalothrin totally stopped tunneling by R. fiavipes at the concentrations as low as 0.4-0.8 ppm.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    53
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
53
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!