
doi: 10.1093/jee/80.4.933
Three different models were used to analyze data for use in binomial (infested/noninfested) sampling plans for the bird cherry-oat aphid, Rhopalosiphum padi (L.). Two of the models gave comparable results, but a third fit less well, especially for proportions >60% infested tillers. Sample sizes for the different models were also calculated and compared with sample size for direct counts. The incidence count method described in this paper should improve aphid sampling efficiency.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 23 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
