
doi: 10.1093/jee/77.3.661
pmid: 6480977
In laboratory and field studies, traps were evaluated to determine effectiveness in the capture of the German cockroach, Blattella germanica (L.). Traps tested included: modified sticky (“Kuru Kuru”; Mr. Sticky), electrified cans, and bottles. Unbaited sticky traps caught significantly more cockroaches than other unbaited designs. There was no significant difference in cockroach catch between bottles or can traps or between petroleum jelly or cans fitted with 18-volt electric barriers. Increased cockroach catch in traps with roughened exterior (paper or sand) was noted. A flat sticky surface was as efficacious as other sticky trap designs tested. In field trials, electrified cans caught significantly more cockroaches than bottle traps. Although large numbers of cockroaches were caught and removed, we conclude that cockroach traps are most effective as monitoring devices, rather than providing acceptable control.
Evaluation Studies as Topic, Animals, Cockroaches, Insect Control
Evaluation Studies as Topic, Animals, Cockroaches, Insect Control
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
