Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Laboratory and Field Evaluations of German Cockroach (Orthoptera: Blattellidae) Traps

Authors: J B, Ballard; R E, Gold;

Laboratory and Field Evaluations of German Cockroach (Orthoptera: Blattellidae) Traps

Abstract

In laboratory and field studies, traps were evaluated to determine effectiveness in the capture of the German cockroach, Blattella germanica (L.). Traps tested included: modified sticky (“Kuru Kuru”; Mr. Sticky), electrified cans, and bottles. Unbaited sticky traps caught significantly more cockroaches than other unbaited designs. There was no significant difference in cockroach catch between bottles or can traps or between petroleum jelly or cans fitted with 18-volt electric barriers. Increased cockroach catch in traps with roughened exterior (paper or sand) was noted. A flat sticky surface was as efficacious as other sticky trap designs tested. In field trials, electrified cans caught significantly more cockroaches than bottle traps. Although large numbers of cockroaches were caught and removed, we conclude that cockroach traps are most effective as monitoring devices, rather than providing acceptable control.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Evaluation Studies as Topic, Animals, Cockroaches, Insect Control

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    12
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
12
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!