Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Clinging and Climbing Ability of Larvae of Eleven Species of Stored-Product Insects on Nine Flexible Packaging Materials and Glass

Authors: L. D. Cline;

Clinging and Climbing Ability of Larvae of Eleven Species of Stored-Product Insects on Nine Flexible Packaging Materials and Glass

Abstract

Larvae of the lepidopteran species Ephestia cautella (Walker), Corcyra cephalonica (Stainton), and Plodia interpunctella (Hubner) clung to and climbed paper, glass, aluminum foil, cellophane, polyethylene (PE). fluorinated ethylenepropylene (FEP), ethylenetetrafluoroethylene (ETFE), polyester (PET), polyvinylchloride (PVC), and polypropylene (PP) at the greatest angle of incline (90°). Larvae of 8 coleopteran specices climbed only 1 material (paper) at 90°. Larvae of some species could not climb some materials at a 5° incline. The coleopteran larvae ranked generally from best to worst climbers were Anthrenus flavipes LeConte, Dermestes maculatus De Geer, Tribolium castaneum (Herbst), Oryzaephilus mercator (Fauvel), Cathartus quadricollis (Guerin-Meneville), Trogoderma variabile Ballion, Attagenus megatoma (F.), and Lasioderma serricorne (F.). The test materials ranked generally from easiest to most difficult to climb were paper, ETFE, PET, foil, cellophane, PE, FEP, glass, PVC, and PP. Three coleopteran species, O. mercator, C. quadricollis , and D. maculatus clung to all materials at 90°. The other larvae ranked generally from best to worst clingers, were T. variabile , T. castaneum, A. flavipes, A. megatoma , and L. serricorne . The test materials, ranked generally from easiest to most difficult to cling to, were paper, glass, PET, ETFE, PVC, cellophane, FEP, foil, PE, and PP.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    6
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
6
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!