Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Journal of Economic ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Journal of Economic Entomology
Article
License: pd
Data sources: UnpayWall
Journal of Economic Entomology
Article . 1931 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Biological Studies of the Oriental Fruit Moth

Authors: C. O. Eddy; W. C. Nettles;

Biological Studies of the Oriental Fruit Moth

Abstract

As a pest of peaches in South Carolina in 1930, the Oriental fruit moth ( Laspeyresia molesta ) was destructive in the Piedmont Section to varieties maturing after the Elberta harvest. It was not a factor in production in the Sand Hill Section at any time. At Clemson College two complete generations were produced, adults of the third and fourth generation appeared, but a portion of the larvae of these generations went into hibernation. Larvae of the fifth generation appeared but all hibernated. The first eggs appeared on April 24, the first larvae on April 29, the first pupae on May 22, and the first moth on June 2. These dates are believed to be much later than normal because of the cold, delayed spring. The first eggs which produced overwintering larvae were laid on August 15 and the last eggs of the season hatched on October 19. The last eggs that produced adults in 1930 were laid on August 31, and the last adult died on October 21 or two days after the first frost. The following parasites were found in South Carolina in 1930:— Arachnophagaa n. sp., Arachnophagaa n. sp., Ascogaster carpocapsae (Vier.), Brachmeria sp? hammari Cwfd., Cremastus tortricidis Cush., Dibrachys boucheanus (Ratz.), Eupelmus cyaniceps var amicus Gir., Eupelmus limneriae (How), Goniozus columbian us Ashm., Haltichella longicornis Ashm., Macrocentrus ancylivora Roh. (introduced), Macrocentrus Delicates Cress., Microbracon mellitor (Say), Phanerotomab species, Dilvachsb species and Pristomerousb species.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
hybrid