
doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx181
pmid: 28637307
Carbapenem resistance in Gram-negative bacteria is increasing in many countries and use of carbapenems and antibiotics to which resistance is linked should be reduced to slow its emergence. There are no directly equivalent antibiotics and the alternatives are less well supported by clinical trials. The few new agents are expensive.To provide guidance on strategies to reduce carbapenem usage.A literature review was performed as described in the BSAC/HIS/BIA/IPS Joint Working Party on Multiresistant Gram-negative Infection Report.Older agents remain active against some of the pathogens, although expectations of broad-spectrum cover for empirical treatment have risen. Education, expert advice on treatment and antimicrobial stewardship can produce significant reductions in use.More agents may need to be introduced onto the antibiotic formulary of the hospital, despite the poor quality of scientific studies in some cases.
formulary, antimicrobial stewardship program, Cross Infection, carbapenem resistance, gram-negative bacteria, Formularies, Hospital as Topic, antibiotics, infection, antimicrobials, Drug Utilization, carbapenem, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Antimicrobial Stewardship, Carbapenems, Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial, Gram-Negative Bacteria, Humans, Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections
formulary, antimicrobial stewardship program, Cross Infection, carbapenem resistance, gram-negative bacteria, Formularies, Hospital as Topic, antibiotics, infection, antimicrobials, Drug Utilization, carbapenem, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Antimicrobial Stewardship, Carbapenems, Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial, Gram-Negative Bacteria, Humans, Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 70 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
