Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Journal of Antimicro...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Article . 2014 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Comment on: Effects of selective digestive decontamination (SDD) on the gut resistome

Authors: J, Hatcher; A, Myers; H, Donaldson; A C, Gordon; R, Meacher; J, Baruah;

Comment on: Effects of selective digestive decontamination (SDD) on the gut resistome

Abstract

Sir, We read with interest the report by Buelow et al. entitled ‘Effects of selective digestive decontamination (SDD) on the gut resistome’. The authors undertook metagenomic analyses to highlight the effect of SDD on an individual’s gut resistome. The authors eloquently describe the limitations of conventional culture techniques, especially as no resistant organisms were cultured in parallel to the molecular methods. We would like to highlight, however, the importance of phenotypic methods of identification of resistant organisms. We report two recent cases of vancomycin-dependent enterococci (VDE) isolated from rectal swabs of patients receiving SDD in an intensive care unit (ICU). These were identified as Enterococcus faecium. In our institution, all patients expected to be intubated for .48 h receive SDD consisting of 6 hourly administration of 80 mg of tobramycin, 250000 U of colistin and 1 million units of nystatin by mouth and nasogastric tube for the duration of intubation. Vancomycin (500 mg) is added to this oral and nasogastric administration due to concerns about methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Patient 1 was admitted to an ICU for management of quadriplegia following an episode of meningitis. He had been an inpatient for several weeks prior to his ICU admission, during which he received several courses of intravenous vancomycin. Whilst in the ICU he continued to receive vancomycin as part of SDD. VDE was isolated from a rectal screening swab on day 145 of intubation. Patient 2 was admitted for management of status epilepticus. She had not been treated with vancomycin other than as part of SDD. VDE was first isolated on day 7 of intubation. Bacterial growth occurred at vancomycin concentrations .1 mg/L, which gave the phenotypic characteristic of growth occurring only around the antibiotic disc or the MIC test strip. To our knowledge, these are the first two isolates of VDE to be reported associated with SDD. VDE were described in the UK in 1994 relating to two renal patients in separate hospitals. Since then, numerous cases of VDE have been reported including nosocomial outbreaks. VDE grow in the presence of vancomycin and are mutants of vancomycin-resistant enterococci. This phenotype results from mutations in the ddl gene leading to an inactive host D-Ala:D-Ala ligase requiring vancomycin to induce the production of peptidoglycan precursors. Although an ability to cause nosocomial infection is recognized, the clinical significance of VDE is not entirely clear. With regard to our cases, VDE was isolated on routine screening swabs and did not appear to lead to clinically significant infection. SDD is a controversial technique and is not employed in all UK ICUs. SDD regimens differ between units, often reflecting local microbiological epidemiology. Including enteral vancomycin has been shown to be effective at controlling MRSA in endemic settings. In 2013, a meta-analysis detected no relationship between the use of SDD or selective oral decontamination (SOD) and the development of antimicrobial resistance. However, the authors acknowledged the need for research over the longer term in ICUs. A recent 4 year ecological study published in JAC reported decreasing trends for resistance to third-generation cephalosporin and ciprofloxacin antibiotics. Conventional culture-based methods were used in both the aforementioned studies focusing on a small selection of resistant organisms. We welcome the study by Buelow et al. for widening the scope of antimicrobial resistance detection, via molecular techniques, highlighting the importance of mobile genetic elements in cross-species transfer of genetic resistance. Molecular techniques have limitations and our two cases demonstrate the continued need for rigorous phenotypic evaluation of organisms isolated in a diagnostic microbiology laboratory. The potential unintended consequence of SDD/SOD on antimicrobial resistance needs careful consideration. We believe that a whole gut microbiome approach is warranted rather than focusing on a narrow spectrum of politically worrisome organisms.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Intestines, Male, Drug Resistance, Bacterial, Humans, Oropharynx, Decontamination, Anti-Bacterial Agents

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Average
Average
Average
bronze