Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of Antimicro...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Article . 2024 . Peer-reviewed
License: OUP Standard Publication Reuse
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Efficacy of meropenem against ceftazidime–avibactam-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae producing KPC-31, KPC-33, KPC-90, KPC-106 and KPC-114

Authors: Jesus G M Pariona; Felipe Vásquez-Ponce; Eva M M Pariona; Rubens R Sousa-Carmo; Thais Martins-Gonçalves; Johana Becerra; Aline V de Lima; +3 Authors

Efficacy of meropenem against ceftazidime–avibactam-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae producing KPC-31, KPC-33, KPC-90, KPC-106 and KPC-114

Abstract

Abstract Background Klebsiella pneumoniae producing KPC variants conferring resistance to ceftazidime–avibactam often remain susceptible to meropenem, suggesting a potential therapeutic use of this antibiotic. Objectives In this study, the efficacy of clinically relevant concentrations of meropenem was evaluated against high-risk clones of ceftazidime–avibactam-resistant K. pneumoniae strains producing KPC variants, in a tandem in vitro time-kill/in vivo Galleria mellonella survival model. Methods In vitro/in vivo efficacy of meropenem against ceftazidime–avibactam-resistant K. pneumoniae of CG16, CG25 and CG258, producing KPC-31, KPC-33, KPC-90, KPC-106 and KPC-114 variants, was evaluated using EUCAST dosing recommendation adjusted to the G. mellonella model. For in vivo assays, untreated, meropenem (40 mg/kg × 1)-treated and ceftazidime–avibactam (40 mg/kg ceftazidime–10 mg/kg avibactam × 1)-treated groups were established, with 60 larvae per group. Kaplan–Meier curves, log-rank tests, univariate Cox regression and hazard ratios (HR) were used to assess treatment effects (P < 0.05). Results For all KPC-variant producers, time-kill assays showed >3 log-kills reduction (−6.91 ± 1.28 SD) after 6 h interaction when exposed to 8–32 mg/L meropenem MIC values (i.e. ≥ × 4 MIC). In the assessment of in vivo efficacy of meropenem, at the 4-day follow-up, mortality rates were 96.7% (untreated), 83.3% (ceftazidime–avibactam-treated) and 13.3% (meropenem-treated) (P < 0.05). Univariate Cox regression analysis showed significantly lower risk in the meropenem group compared to untreated group [HR 0.02 (95% CI: 0.01–0.05)]. Conclusions These pre-clinical results might support use of meropenem as a potential alternative for treatment of infections due to KPC-variant producers displaying in vitro susceptibility to meropenem.

Keywords

Klebsiella pneumoniae, Drug Combinations, Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial, Animals, Meropenem, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Azabicyclo Compounds, Ceftazidime, Survival Analysis, beta-Lactamases, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Klebsiella Infections

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!