
AbstractBackgroundCommunity-acquired carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CA-CRE) are an important threat.MethodsIn CRACKLE-2, we defined patients with CA-CRE as admitted from home, without pre-existing conditions, and a positive culture within 48 h of admission. Healthcare-associated CRE (HA-CRE) were those with the lowest likelihood of community acquisition, not admitted from home and cultured >48 h after admission. Specific genetic markers in carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae were evaluated through random forest modelling.ResultsCA-CRE and HA-CRE were detected in 83 (10%) and 208 (26%) of 807 patients. No significant differences were observed in bacterial species or strain type distribution. K. pneumoniae (204/291, 70%) was the most common CRE species, of these 184/204 (90%) were carbapenemase producers (CPKP). The top three genetic markers in random forest models were kpi_SA15, fimE, and kpfC. Of these, kpi_SA15 (which encodes a chaperone/usher system) was positively associated (OR 3.14, 95% CI 1.13–8.87, P = 0.026), and kpfC negatively associated (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.05–0.72, P = 0.015) with CA-CPKP.ConclusionsTen percent of CDC-defined CRE were CA. The true proportion of CA-CRE in hospitalized patients is likely lower as patients may have had unrecorded prior healthcare exposure. The kpi_SA15 operon was associated with the CA phenotype.
Genetic Markers, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae, Bacterial Proteins, Carbapenems, Enterobacteriaceae Infections, Humans, beta-Lactamases, Anti-Bacterial Agents
Genetic Markers, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae, Bacterial Proteins, Carbapenems, Enterobacteriaceae Infections, Humans, beta-Lactamases, Anti-Bacterial Agents
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 21 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
