
The infection of biomaterials is determined by an interplay of adhesion and surface growth of the infecting organisms. In this study, the antimicrobial effects on adhering bacteria of a positively charged poly(methacrylate) surface (xi potential +12 mV) were compared with those of negatively charged poly(methyl methacrylate) (-12 mV) and a highly negatively charged poly(methacrylate) (-18 mV) surface. Initial adhesion of Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 12600, Staphylococcus epidermidis HBH(2) 102, Escherichia coli O2K2 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa AK1 to these surfaces was measured in a parallel plate flow chamber in phosphate-buffered saline. Adhering bacteria were allowed to multiply by perfusing the flow chamber with growth medium. All bacteria adhered most rapidly to the positively charged surface, but there was no subsequent surface growth of the Gram-negative strains. On the negatively charged surfaces, despite a slower initial adhesion, surface growth of the adhering bacteria was exponential for both Gram-positive and Gram-negative strains. These results suggest that positively charged biomaterial surfaces exert an antimicrobial effect on adhering Gram-negative bacteria, but not on Gram-positive ones.
INITIAL ADHESION, FLOW CHAMBER, Biocompatible Materials, Bacterial Infections, Gram-Positive Bacteria, COPOLYMERS, Bacterial Adhesion, METHACRYLATE POLYMERS, Gram-Negative Bacteria, GROWTH, MICROBIAL ADHESION, METIS-204849, IMAGE-ANALYSIS, STAPHYLOCOCCI
INITIAL ADHESION, FLOW CHAMBER, Biocompatible Materials, Bacterial Infections, Gram-Positive Bacteria, COPOLYMERS, Bacterial Adhesion, METHACRYLATE POLYMERS, Gram-Negative Bacteria, GROWTH, MICROBIAL ADHESION, METIS-204849, IMAGE-ANALYSIS, STAPHYLOCOCCI
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 524 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
