Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.1093/jac/27.1.63
pmid: 1904851
The in-vitro inactivation of metronidazole by different clinical isolates of Enterococcus faecalis was investigated by means of association experiments in which Ent. faecalis strains and Bacteroides fragilis group strains were cultured in the same liquid medium. All of the tested Ent. faecalis strains (20 isolates) were able to protect the B. fragilis group strains against the killing effect of metronidazole at a concentration four or eight times higher than the normal MIC. Different strains of Streptococcus (14), Staphylococcus aureus (10), Staph, epidermidis (10) and Escherichia coli (8) failed to exhibit the same effect. When Ent. faecalis strains were cultured anaerobically for 24 h in the presence of 4 mg metronidazole/l, either alone or together with different B. fragilis group strains, no metronidazole could be detected subsequently in the culture supernatants by HPLC. Concomitantly an increase of four or five logs in the viable counts of the co-cultured Bacteroides strains was observed compared with Bacteroides strains cultured alone. Sonicated cell extracts of Ent. faecalis cultured either aerobically or anaerobically were found to inactivate metronidazole to the same extent, whereas the culture supernatants had no such effect.
Bacteroides fragilis, Bacteriological Techniques, Species Specificity, Metronidazole, Colony Count, Microbial, Enterococcus faecalis, 01.06. Biológiai tudományok, 03.02. Klinikai orvostan, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid
Bacteroides fragilis, Bacteriological Techniques, Species Specificity, Metronidazole, Colony Count, Microbial, Enterococcus faecalis, 01.06. Biológiai tudományok, 03.02. Klinikai orvostan, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 51 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 10 | |
| downloads | 4 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts