Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Comparison of Infection Rates and Severity of Illness for Influenza A Subtypes H1N1 and H3N2

Authors: A L, Frank; L H, Taber; J M, Wells;

Comparison of Infection Rates and Severity of Illness for Influenza A Subtypes H1N1 and H3N2

Abstract

In the Houston Family Study, overall rates of infection for the three major outbreaks of influenza A from 1977 to 1981 were higher for subtype H3N2 than for H1N1. Rates in school children were almost identical, but rates of infection with H1N1 were lower in adults and in preschool children, especially those younger than two years of age. However, rates for the two subtypes were similar in young children within families that experienced influenza A infections. In the total population overall illness rates among infected persons were identical, and diagnoses were similar. Among 145 identified primary infections (1977-1982), more H3N2 infections resulted in systemic (febrile) illness or lower-respiratory-tract disease, but a detailed comparison of illness features of 54 primary infections in children aged two to five years showed no significant differences. Epidemiological differences appear to be more important than pathogenic potential in determining the community impact of these two subtypes of type A influenza virus.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Adolescent, Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype, Age Factors, Infant, Texas, Disease Outbreaks, Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype, Influenza A virus, Child, Preschool, Influenza, Human, Humans, Female, Child

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    69
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
69
Top 10%
Top 1%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!