Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Localization of Cholera Toxin In Vivo

Authors: Richard A. Finkelstein; Johnny W. Peterson; Joseph LoSpalluto;

Localization of Cholera Toxin In Vivo

Abstract

Immunohistochemical techniques, done with fluorescein- and horseradish peroxidase-labeled antibodies specifically purified by immunoadsorption, were used to show cholera-toxin antigen in intestinal tissues from adult mice injected intraluminally with highly purified cholera toxin. The toxin (choleragen) and natural toxoid (choleragenoid), but not formalin-inactivated toxoids, were specifically and selectively adsorbed uniformly to the entire mucosal surface of the villi and crypt areas. No penetration of toxin into the epithelium or the lamina propria was observed. Ultrastructural localization studies, using the peroxidase-antibody method, revealed the toxin to be on the membranes of the microvilli. Autoradiography with highly purified, tritium-labeled toxin confirmed these observations. It is suggested that specific adsorption of toxin to the brush-border membrane is the initial step in the pathogenesis of cholera, but that an additional process, stimulated by toxin but not toxoid, is essential. This could be activation of adenyl cyclase. The possibility that amounts of toxin or toxin fragments below the limits of detection by the systems used could penetrate cannot be excluded. Since there is a systemic antitoxin response in cholera, this is likely to occur but may not actually be important in the pathogenesis of the diarrhea of cholera.

Keywords

Goats, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Toxoids, Tritium, Antibodies, Chromatography, Affinity, Intestines, Enterotoxins, Mice, Microscopy, Electron, Cholera, Peroxidases, Immunoglobulin G, Methods, Animals, Autoradiography, Binding Sites, Antibody, Horses, Rabbits, Intestinal Mucosa

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    105
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
105
Average
Top 1%
Top 1%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!