Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ International Journa...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
International Journal of Epidemiology
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 6 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Cohort Profile: The Nor-Work Cohort

Authors: Rachel L Hasting; Suzanne L Merkus; Karina Undem; Jorunn Kirkeleit; Rune Hoff; Jon Michael Gran; Karl-Christian Nordby; +1 Authors

Cohort Profile: The Nor-Work Cohort

Abstract

BackgroundPost-acute non-specific symptoms such as headaches, muscular pain, and fatigue are frequently reported following COVID-19 vaccination, raising concerns about adverse events. As vaccine-hesitant individuals may be more likely to experience symptoms of vaccines, this study investigates whether COVID-19 vaccination increases the odds of post-acute non-specific symptoms, stratified by COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy.MethodsThis longitudinal study uses repeated measurements from the BiCoVac cohort—a random sample of 913 116 Danish citizens aged 16–65 years. Data were collected through national registers and questionnaires (May 2021–June 2022). Non-specific symptoms were identified by using the 25-item Bodily Distress Syndrome checklist and analysed by using logistic and linear regression models comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. Models were fitted with robust standard errors and inverse probability of selection weights.ResultsA total of 132 776 observations were collected from 61 316 COVID-19 vaccine-unconcerned individuals, 52 325 observations from 25 272 COVID-19 vaccine-sceptical individuals, and 10 242 observations from 5064 COVID-19 vaccine-concerned individuals. Among the vaccine-unconcerned individuals, those vaccinated had lower odds of most symptoms compared with unvaccinated individuals >4 weeks post-vaccination [e.g. muscular pain: odds ratio (OR) = 0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.47–0.68]. A similar tendency was found for vaccine-sceptical individuals, although with attenuated estimates. Conversely, among vaccine-concerned individuals, we observed a tendency for higher odds of most symptoms >4 weeks post-vaccination compared with unvaccinated individuals (e.g. muscular pain: OR = 1.23, 95% CI: 0.91–1.67).ConclusionFor most individuals aged 16–65 years, we found no evidence of post-acute symptoms after COVID-19 vaccination. Vaccinated vaccine-concerned individuals were, however, more likely to report most symptoms, potentially due to reporting bias or nocebo effects. BackgroundPost-acute non-specific symptoms such as headaches, muscular pain, and fatigue are frequently reported following COVID-19 vaccination, raising concerns about adverse events. As vaccine-hesitant individuals may be more likely to experience symptoms of vaccines, this study investigates whether COVID-19 vaccination increases the odds of post-acute non-specific symptoms, stratified by COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy.MethodsThis longitudinal study uses repeated measurements from the BiCoVac cohort—a random sample of 913 116 Danish citizens aged 16–65 years. Data were collected through national registers and questionnaires (May 2021–June 2022). Non-specific symptoms were identified by using the 25-item Bodily Distress Syndrome checklist and analysed by using logistic and linear regression models comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. Models were fitted with robust standard errors and inverse probability of selection weights.ResultsA total of 132 776 observations were collected from 61 316 COVID-19 vaccine-unconcerned individuals, 52 325 observations from 25 272 COVID-19 vaccine-sceptical individuals, and 10 242 observations from 5064 COVID-19 vaccine-concerned individuals. Among the vaccine-unconcerned individuals, those vaccinated had lower odds of most symptoms compared with unvaccinated individuals >4 weeks post-vaccination [e.g. muscular pain: odds ratio (OR) = 0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.47–0.68]. A similar tendency was found for vaccine-sceptical individuals, although with attenuated estimates. Conversely, among vaccine-concerned individuals, we observed a tendency for higher odds of most symptoms >4 weeks post-vaccination compared with unvaccinated individuals (e.g. muscular pain: OR = 1.23, 95% CI: 0.91–1.67).ConclusionFor most individuals aged 16–65 years, we found no evidence of post-acute symptoms after COVID-19 vaccination. Vaccinated vaccine-concerned individuals were, however, more likely to report most symptoms, potentially due to reporting bias or nocebo effects.

Country
Denmark
Keywords

cohort profile, Cohort Profile, working life, occupational health, occupational exposure

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
hybrid