<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
pmid: 15689350
Studies have suggested that ultrasound-guided embryo transfer (UG-ET) may improve the outcome in IVF; however, several factors may account for the improvement in pregnancy rate. This study examines the use of ultrasound to determine the accuracy of trial transfer (TT) in preparation for ET.Sixty-seven consecutive patients prospectively underwent UG-ET over a 2 month period. Total cavity length by US was compared with the length noted by TT. A difference of > or = 1 cm was considered significant. All embryos were placed within 1-2 cm of the fundus by US.Twenty patients (29.9%) had a difference of > or = 1 cm and 13 patients (19.4%) had a difference of or = 1 or > or = 1.5 cm had a significantly greater depth at transfer (P or = 1 or > or = 1.5 cm versus no difference. There were no ectopic pregnancies.Nineteen percent of patients had a discrepancy of > or = 1.5 cm and approximately 30% had a difference of > or = 1 cm from TT at UG-ET, suggesting a benefit to UG-ET. A large prospective randomized trial comparing UG-ET with blind transfer is required to assess further if UG-ET should be used in all cases of ET.
Adult, Pregnancy Rate, Incidence, Uterus, Fertilization in Vitro, Embryo Transfer, Abortion, Spontaneous, Pregnancy, Humans, Female, Embryo Implantation, Prospective Studies, Ultrasonography
Adult, Pregnancy Rate, Incidence, Uterus, Fertilization in Vitro, Embryo Transfer, Abortion, Spontaneous, Pregnancy, Humans, Female, Embryo Implantation, Prospective Studies, Ultrasonography
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 25 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |