
Abstract Deep learning can revolutionise high-throughput image-based phenotyping by automating the measurement of complex traits, a task that is often labour-intensive, time-consuming, and prone to human error. However, its precision and adaptability in accurately phenotyping organ-level traits, such as fruit morphology, remain to be fully evaluated. Establishing the links between phenotypic and genotypic variation is essential for uncovering the genetic basis of traits and can also provide an orthologous test of pipeline effectiveness. In this study, we assess the efficacy of deep learning for measuring variation in fruit morphology in Arabidopsis using images from a multiparent advanced generation intercross (MAGIC) mapping family. We trained an instance segmentation model and developed a pipeline to phenotype Arabidopsis fruit morphology, based on the model outputs. Our model achieved strong performance with an average precision of 88.0% for detection and 55.9% for segmentation. Quantitative trait locus analysis of the derived phenotypic metrics of the MAGIC population identified significant loci associated with fruit morphology. This analysis, based on automated phenotyping of 332,194 individual fruits, underscores the capability of deep learning as a robust tool for phenotyping large populations. Our pipeline for quantifying pod morphological traits is scalable and provides high-quality phenotype data, facilitating genetic analysis and gene discovery, as well as advancing crop breeding research.
Phenotype, Deep Learning, Research, Fruit, Quantitative Trait Loci, Arabidopsis, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Phenotype, Deep Learning, Research, Fruit, Quantitative Trait Loci, Arabidopsis, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
