
doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giab003 , 10.26181/14337101.v1 , 10.26181/606276e9031fc , 10.26181/14337101
pmid: 33590862
pmc: PMC7931822
handle: 11343/273020
doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giab003 , 10.26181/14337101.v1 , 10.26181/606276e9031fc , 10.26181/14337101
pmid: 33590862
pmc: PMC7931822
handle: 11343/273020
Abstract Background The data produced by long-read third-generation sequencers have unique characteristics compared to short-read sequencing data, often requiring tailored analysis tools for tasks ranging from quality control to downstream processing. The rapid growth in software that addresses these challenges for different genomics applications is difficult to keep track of, which makes it hard for users to choose the most appropriate tool for their analysis goal and for developers to identify areas of need and existing solutions to benchmark against. Findings We describe the implementation of long-read-tools.org, an open-source database that organizes the rapidly expanding collection of long-read data analysis tools and allows its exploration through interactive browsing and filtering. The current database release contains 478 tools across 32 categories. Most tools are developed in Python, and the most frequent analysis tasks include base calling, de novo assembly, error correction, quality checking/filtering, and isoform detection, while long-read single-cell data analysis and transcriptomics are areas with the fewest tools available. Conclusion Continued growth in the application of long-read sequencing in genomics research positions the long-read-tools.org database as an essential resource that allows researchers to keep abreast of both established and emerging software to help guide the selection of the most relevant tool for their analysis needs.
Nanopore Sequencing, Technical Note, 610, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Genomics, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Software, 004, Uncategorized
Nanopore Sequencing, Technical Note, 610, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Genomics, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Software, 004, Uncategorized
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 46 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
