Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Geneticsarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Genetics
Article . 1963 . Peer-reviewed
License: OUP Standard Publication Reuse
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Genetics
Article
Data sources: UnpayWall
Genetics
Article . 2007
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

PROTEIN DIFFERENCES IN DROSOPHILA. I. DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER

Authors: J L, Hubby;

PROTEIN DIFFERENCES IN DROSOPHILA. I. DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER

Abstract

ONE electrophoresis affords a simple, rapid technique for comparing and characterizing proteins. It is especially suitable for investigations of genetically altered proteins, and notable results have come from the use of this method in studying hemoglobins (INGRAM 1961 ) and haptoglobins ( CONNELL, DIXON and SMITHIES 1962). Drosophila melanogaster is extraordinary in terms of the extensive array of genetic techniques which have been developed for analyses of its genetic system. However, it has seldom provided material for physiological genetic analysis. This is largely true because few biochemical differences, especially protein differences, are readily demonstrable in the organism. For analyzing controlling mechanisms in development, variegated position effects, or other genetic phenomena characteristic of higher organisms, Drosophila melanogaster remains the experimental animal par excellence. The demonstration of protein differences in a system amenable to sophisticated genetic analysis offers unusual opportunity for integrating genetic, biochemical, and developmental approaches at the level of gene action. To this end, methods have been developed for analyzing protein differences in mutant stocks of Drosophila. The techniques employed have also been used with a variety of materials in this laboratory. Over thirty-five species in the genus Drosophila have been analyzed, and the results of this screening will be the subject to a separate paper in this series. Tetrahymena has been analyzed using identical methods, and a large number of migrating protein bands was resolved (DUNHAM 1962). Similar techniques have been successfully employed using embryonic and adult chick brain as the starting material ( WYTTENBACH, personal communication). Thus, the methods to be described here are potentially useful with a broad array of materials and for investigating a wide variety of problems. The report includes a description of the methods employed, the results obtained from the initial screening of mutant stocks, and a preliminary analysis of a protein difference detected in strains of the mutant glass of D. melanogaster.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    38
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
38
Average
Top 1%
Top 10%
hybrid