Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Geneticsarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Genetics
Article . 1962 . Peer-reviewed
License: OUP Standard Publication Reuse
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Genetics
Article
Data sources: UnpayWall
Genetics
Article . 2007
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

LINKAGE IN AUTOTETRAPLOID MAIZE

Authors: J E, Welch;

LINKAGE IN AUTOTETRAPLOID MAIZE

Abstract

bivalent and, since four potential gametes result from each meiosis, these strands pass to different gametes and may, genetically, be dealt with separately. The only concern, therefore, is with the proportioris of each type of strand resulting from crossing-over and their possible combinations in the zygotes. Allopolyploids, such as wheat, show the same general type of genetical behavior since multivalent formation is rare. In autopolyploids, on the other hand, more than four chromatids are concerned in the formation of the various configurations which occur at the first division of meiosis, and, since there are still only four gametes formed, each gamete receives more than one strand from each configuration. Hence with autopolyploids there is the additional consideration of the ways in which the chromatids may be combined in the gametes themselves. This leads to a number of complications in the analysis of linkage in autopolyploids. MULLER (1914) calculated the monofactorial segregations to be expected from autotetraploids if the two chromatids of each chromosome acted as one at the first meiotic division, and HALDANE (1930) extended the work to include several higher autopolyploids. This mode of inheritance is called chromosome segregation. HALDANE (1930) also established the segregations to be expected if the two chromatids from each chromosome acted entirely independently of one another. Random chromatid segregation is the term applied to this method. SOMME (1930) reported some linkage studies in autotetraploid Primula sinensis and DE WINTON and HALDANE (1931) in a more comprehensive investigation of the subject, using the same plant, gave the linkage formulae applicable to the chromosome type of segregation. SANSOME (1933), working with the tomato, presented the corresponding linkage formulae on the basis of random chromatid segregation. In addition to these cases of linkage studies in autopolyploid plants, investigations on crossing-over in triploid Drosophila melanogaster have been reported by BRIDGES and ANDERSON (1925) and REDFIELD (1930, 1932). Later workers ( MATHER 1936) have recognized that these segregation and linkage expectations are in the nature of limiting types, and that the true segregations to be expected TF irst division of meiosis four chromatids take part in the formation of each

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    23
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
23
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
hybrid