
Abstract Importance sampling is proposed as a technique for estimating log volume that eliminates the bias of conventional methods arising from irregular log taper. In a trial of the technique, the average relative sampling error for individual logs, based on a measurement of one cross-section per log, was 5.2%. To estimate an aggregate volume, a two-stage sampling procedure is suggested in which importance sampling constitutes the second stage. Optimal sampling strategy is discussed briefly. Forest Sci. 32:1073-1078.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
