Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
Forest Sciencearrow_drop_down
Forest Science
Article . 1973 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

Incompatibility between Picea pungens Engelm. and Picea engelmannii Parry

Authors: Susan V. Kossuth; Gilbert H. Fechner;

Incompatibility between Picea pungens Engelm. and Picea engelmannii Parry

Abstract

Abstract Ovule development was studied in reciprocal crosses between Picea pungens Engelm. (blue spruce) and P. engelmannii Parry (Engelmann spruce). Reproductive failure was found to occur at several stages through the proembryo stage. Some pollen did not germinate; other pollen showed slight penetration of the nucellus before death occurred; and still other pollen brought about fertilization. Cessation of hybrid ovule growth occurred from the free nuclear stage through the egg stage. Irregularities within the archegonium before degeneration included the presence of large bodies, apparently protein, additional scattered chromatin-like material, and extra nuclei. Female gametophytes (prothallia) without archegonia contained proliferated and necrotic cells in the archegonial region. Necrosis of the female gametophyte occurred nine days after strobilus pollination in unpollinated ovules. Engelmann spruce × blue spruce ovules were similar to the reciprocal cross except when the female gametophyte grew into a group of few but very large cells and when greatly shrunken nucellar tissue was found in ovules with cellular female gametophytes. Incompatibility rather than embryo inviability is apparently the primary mechanism preventing high crossability between these two species. Forest Sci. 19:50-60.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!