Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
Forest Sciencearrow_drop_down
Forest Science
Article . 1968 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

Evaluation of Adhesives for Foliar Application of Chemicals

Authors: Roger W. Bullard; Dan L. Campbell;

Evaluation of Adhesives for Foliar Application of Chemicals

Abstract

Abstract Thirty-nine commercial adhesives were evaluated for their ability to form weather-resistant films for retaining chemical repellents on coniferous trees. Fifteen were rejected because of poor film retention in accelerated weathering tests or because they could not be formulated as 10-percent solids in water. The rest received advanced laboratory evaluations designed to measure film quality on Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco seedlings. None appeared phytotoxic. The 10 judged to form the highest-quality films were tested on seedlings exposed in the nursery for 3 months and for 1 year. Four acrylic-based adhesives weathered best for both periods. No adhesive was statistically superior to the widely used acrylic, Rhoplex AC-33.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!