
Abstract Thirty-nine commercial adhesives were evaluated for their ability to form weather-resistant films for retaining chemical repellents on coniferous trees. Fifteen were rejected because of poor film retention in accelerated weathering tests or because they could not be formulated as 10-percent solids in water. The rest received advanced laboratory evaluations designed to measure film quality on Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco seedlings. None appeared phytotoxic. The 10 judged to form the highest-quality films were tested on seedlings exposed in the nursery for 3 months and for 1 year. Four acrylic-based adhesives weathered best for both periods. No adhesive was statistically superior to the widely used acrylic, Rhoplex AC-33.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
