Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Weighted Least Squares Method and Construction of Volume Tables

Authors: T. Cunia;

Weighted Least Squares Method and Construction of Volume Tables

Abstract

Abstract Constructing tree volume tables by the method of least squares has one main drawback, namely that the variance of the tree volume is not homogeneous. In the first part of the paper "General Theory" two theorems are given. Theorem 1 shows that if (1) [formula] are independent random variables, (2) [formula] and (3) [formula] where [formula] may be an unknown quantity but the wj are known positive constants then the best linear estimate of y is [formula] where the b's are obtained by minimizing the weighted sum of squares [Equation] with respect to bi. Formulae for calculating the standard errors of the regression estimates are also given. Theorem 2 shows that if (3) from Theorem 1 is changed to (3a) [formula] where [formula] is any known function of the additional known variable Zj and K² may be any unknown quantity, then the weighted least squares estimates of the regression of y on [formula] is equivalent to the least squares estimate of the regression of [formula] on the independent variables [formula]. Consequently, standard least squares techniques for calculating regression coefficients, their standard errors and tests of significance are fully applicable. Part 2 analyses the variance of the tree volume and shows from actual data that it can vary from .02 (cu ft)² to more than 400 (cu ft)². Furthermore, the conditions of Theorem 2 are for all practical purposes fulfilled. Part 3 gives several examples of the application of the Theorem 1 and Theorem 2 to actual data. It also compares the least squares and the weighted least squares estimates with the experimental data and shows by visual inspection how much better the weighted least squares method of regression can be.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!