A comparison between dental measurements taken from CBCT models and those taken from a digital method: a query about methodology

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 29 May 2013 English Publisher:Oxford University Press (OUP)Journal:The European Journal of Orthodontics, volume 35, pages 714-715 (issn: 0141-5387, eissn: 1460-2210,

Copyright policy )

Authors: Siamak, Sabour; Hamed, Kermani;

doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjt022

pmid: 23720446

A comparison between dental measurements taken from CBCT models and those taken from a digital method: a query about methodology

- Summary
- Subjects
- Related research
  (2)
- Metrics

Abstract

Sir, We were interested to read the article by Tarazona et al. published in the February 2013 issue of European Journal of Orthodontics . The authors assessed reliability, accuracy, and reproducibility in measuring mesiodistal tooth sizes, bicanine widths, bimolar widths, and arch lengths using cone-beam-computed tomography (CBCT) and compared them with the same measurements obtained using a two-dimensional digital method (Tarazona and Llamas, 2013) They reported that the correlation study of the two measuring …

Related Organizations

Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Keywords

Male, Humans, Female, Cone-Beam Computed Tomography, Molar, Tooth, Models, Dental

2 Research products, page 1 of 1

Maxillary Arch Dimension Changes of 3-5 Years Old Filipino Children
2014IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
Dental arch form in the cercopithecidae
1984IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	1
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average