Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Is Leaf Size Important for a Leaf-Galling Sawfly (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae)?

Authors: Karen M. Clancy; Peter W. Price; Christopher F. Sacchi;

Is Leaf Size Important for a Leaf-Galling Sawfly (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae)?

Abstract

We evaluated the importance of leaf size in determining oviposition choice (i.e., gall densities), gall (and larval) size, and larval survivorship for a population of leaf-galling sawflies, Pontania sp. nr. pacifica Marlatt, on arroyo willow, Salix lasiolepis Bentham. Our results did not support the hypothesis that female sawflies prefer to oviposit in developing willow leaves that will be larger when they are fully expanded. Although leaves with four to seven galls had bigger leaf areas than leaves with one to three galls, the size of the mature leaf did not appear to be an important factor determining which leaves were selected for oviposition among the leaves available. The data did not support the prediction that larger leaves produce Pontania sp. galls (and larvae) that are substantially bigger than those on smaller leaves; gall size was only weakly correlated with leaf area ( r ≤ 0.253). We hypothesized that survivorship of Pontania sp. larvae would be positively related to leaf size, but the result was opposite. In total, larval survival was weakly biased toward smaller leaves, primarily because of lower mortality from natural enemies. Mortality from two species of inquilines was positively related to leaf area, whereas mortality from two ectoparasitoids showed inconsistent relationships to leaf area. The absence of strong directional selection illustrates that it would be unlikely for female sawflies to evolve a leaf size choice strategy based on maximizing survival rates of their offspring.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    27
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
27
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!