
doi: 10.1093/dote/10.2.90
pmid: 9179476
Perforation of esophageal cancer is an unusual complication that most often results from instrumentation. The management of this condition must be individualized on the basis of the patient's condition and the stage of the cancer. For patients who are otherwise well and have localized disease, a standard resection is performed. Stent placement and esophageal exclusion are sometimes used for patients in good condition but in whom resection is not feasible. Supportive care alone is reserved for patients who have end-stage disease or are otherwise not candidates for aggressive therapy. Although the overall mortality rate is 50%, the risk for patients who undergo resection is less than 10%. This risk is similar to that found in patients undergoing elective resection and supports the concept that aggressive therapy should be pursued in highly selected patients with perforated esophageal cancers.
Esophagectomy, Risk, Survival Rate, Esophageal Perforation, Esophageal Neoplasms, Esophagoscopes, Humans, Neoplasm Staging
Esophagectomy, Risk, Survival Rate, Esophageal Perforation, Esophageal Neoplasms, Esophagoscopes, Humans, Neoplasm Staging
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 10 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
