In this paper, we compare the number of unmatched nodes and the size of dilations in two main random network models, the Scale-Free and Clustered Scale-Free networks. The number of unmatched nodes determines the necessary number of control inputs and is known to be a measure for network controllability, while the size of dilation is a measure of controllability recovery in case of control input failure. Our results show that clustered version of Scale-Free networks require fewer control inputs for controllability. Further, the average size of dilations is smaller in clustered Scale-Free networks, implying that potentially fewer options for controllability recovery are available.