Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao The Computer Journalarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
The Computer Journal
Article . 2024 . Peer-reviewed
License: OUP Standard Publication Reuse
Data sources: Crossref
DBLP
Article . 2025
Data sources: DBLP
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

A comparison of reserved graph grammar and edge-based graph grammar

Authors: Yang Zou 0001;

A comparison of reserved graph grammar and edge-based graph grammar

Abstract

Abstract Context-sensitive graph grammars are natural formalisms for the generation and parsing of visual programming languages. Being intuitive, rigorous, and expressive tools, they have been frequently employed in a wide range of research fields. Nevertheless, the expressive powers of the existing context-sensitive formalisms have not been investigated yet. To this end, this paper is dedicated to the comparison of expressive powers of the two prevalent graph grammar formalisms, Reserved Graph Grammar (RGG) and Edge-based Graph Grammar (EGG). By introducing a special variant of RGG as an intermediary, the relation between them concerning the expressive power is revealed that the set of graph languages of EGG is a proper subset of that of RGG. Moreover, bidirectional transformations between EGG and the variant of RGG are accordingly established, allowing them to take the advantages of each other in applications.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!