
Summary: The exponential growth of the internet has led to a great deal of interest in developing useful and efficient tools and software to assist users in searching the Web. Document retrieval, categorization, routing and filtering can all be formulated as classification problems. However, the complexity of natural languages and the extremely high dimensionality of the feature space of documents have made this classification problem very difficult. We investigate four different methods for document classification: the naive Bayes classifier, the nearest neighbour classifier, decision trees and a subspace method. These were applied to seven-class Yahoo news groups (business, entertainment, health, international, politics, sports and technology) individually and in combination. We studied three classifier combination approaches: simple voting, dynamic classifier selection and adaptive classifier combination. Our experimental results indicate that the naive Bayes classifier and the subspace method outperform the other two classifiers on our data sets. Combinations of multiple classifiers did not always improve the classification accuracy compared to the best individual classifier. Among the three different combination approaches, our adaptive classifier combination method introduced here performed the best. The best classification accuracy that we are able to achieve on this seven-class problem is approximately 83\%, which is comparable to the performance of other similar studies. However, the classification problem considered here is more difficult because the pattern classes used in our experiments have a large overlap of words in their corresponding documents.
Information storage and retrieval of data, document retrieval
Information storage and retrieval of data, document retrieval
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 215 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 0.1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
