
Although facilitation of the corticospinal system during action observation is widely accepted, it remains controversial whether this facilitation reflects a replica of the observed movements or the goal of the observed motor acts. In the present study, we asked whether, when an object is grasped by using a tool, corticospinal facilitation represents 1) the movements of the hand, 2) the movements of the tool, or 3) the distal goal of the action. To address this question, we recorded motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) to transcranial magnetic stimulation while participants observed a hand reaching and grasping a mothball by using 3 types of pliers, requiring different hand-tool movements to achieve the same goal (grasping the object). We found that MEPs recorded from the opponens pollicis and from the first dorsal interosseous reflected the observed hand movements rather than the movements of the tool or the distal goal of the action. These results suggest that during observation of tool actions, detailed motor matching recruits online the same muscles as those used in the observed action.
Adult, Male, Observer Variation, Tool Use Behavior, Motion Perception, Pyramidal Tracts, Evoked Potentials, Motor, Hand, Imitative Behavior, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Young Adult, Humans, Female, action observation; goal; motor-evoked potentials; reachto- grasp; transcranial magnetic stimulation, action observation; goal; motor-evoked potentials; reach-to-grasp; transcranial magnetic stimulation, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance
Adult, Male, Observer Variation, Tool Use Behavior, Motion Perception, Pyramidal Tracts, Evoked Potentials, Motor, Hand, Imitative Behavior, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Young Adult, Humans, Female, action observation; goal; motor-evoked potentials; reachto- grasp; transcranial magnetic stimulation, action observation; goal; motor-evoked potentials; reach-to-grasp; transcranial magnetic stimulation, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 54 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
