Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Clinical and Experim...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Clinical and Experimental Dermatology
Article . 2026 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Topical statins in the treatment of porokeratosis: a systematic review

Authors: Jeff, Martini; Maria Gnarra, Buethe; Lihi, Atzmony;

Topical statins in the treatment of porokeratosis: a systematic review

Abstract

Abstract Porokeratosis is a chronic disorder of keratinization associated with significant morbidity and no spontaneous resolution. Currently, there are no therapies approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). However, the off-label use of topical statins - targeting the mevalonate pathway - has shown promise as a novel therapeutic strategy. This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of topical statins in the treatment of porokeratosis. We conducted a systematic review of the PubMed, Semantic Scholar and Cochrane databases from 1 January 2015 to 15 February 2025, identifying clinical studies evaluating topical statin therapy (atorvastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin, rosuvastatin or simvastatin) in patients with any subtype of porokeratosis. Twenty-four studies encompassing 95 patients met the inclusion criteria. Most publications (88%) were case reports. The majority of patients (79%) received compounded topical lovastatin 2% or simvastatin 2%, typically in combination with cholesterol 2%. Clinical improvement - defined as partial resolution of symptoms or reduction in lesion size - was observed in 92% of patients (87 of 95), with onset of response reported as early as 4 weeks. Adverse events were reported in 15% of patients, primarily mild, localized dermatological reactions. Two patients discontinued treatment due to side effects. Topical statins appear to provide preliminary evidence of some clinical benefits in porokeratosis by inhibiting the mevalonate pathway, supporting a promising and plausible mechanism-based approach. However, the use of off-label compounded formulations introduces variability in efficacy and safety due to lack of quality control. The absence of FDA-approved therapies for porokeratosis represents an ongoing unmet therapeutic need warranting further investigation in prospective, controlled studies. Together, these preliminary case reports indicating clinical benefit encourage the development of an FDA-approved, Good Manufacturing Practice-quality topical statin formulation that is carefully evaluated in rigorous, well-designed clinical trials that demonstrate safety and substantial evidence of effectiveness.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
hybrid