Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Clinical and Experim...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Clinical and Experimental Dermatology
Article . 2024 . Peer-reviewed
License: OUP Standard Publication Reuse
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Efficient topical treatments of cutaneous lupus erythematosus: a systematic review and network ­meta-analysis

Authors: Takemichi Fukasawa; Asako Yoshizaki-Ogawa; Atsushi Enomoto; Kiyoshi Miyagawa; Shinichi Sato; Ayumi Yoshizaki;

Efficient topical treatments of cutaneous lupus erythematosus: a systematic review and network ­meta-analysis

Abstract

Abstract Although topical agents have been used to treat cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE), there was previously no high-quality evidence of which agents were most effective and which clinical scores were most suitable. On 22 December 2023, a search was conducted across five databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for CLE. Two authors independently screened the titles and abstracts of articles based on predetermined criteria. Selected articles were then assessed for inclusion in a blinded manner, with any disagreements resolved through consensus. Data were abstracted in duplicate, and a random-effects model was utilized for network meta-analysis. The certainty of the evidence was evaluated according to the PRISMA guidelines, using the GRADE approach. The analysis was finalized in January 2024, with the primary outcome focused on the change in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) from baseline. Seven RCTs involving 231 participants were analysed. The network meta-analysis revealed that nicotinamide 4% demonstrated the highest probability of achieving the intended outcomes, with a mean difference (MD) of 3.10 and a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.99–4.21. Additionally, clobetasol 0.05%, nicotinamide 2% and tacrolimus 0.1% also exhibited statistically significant differences, with MDs of 2.30 (95% CI of 0.73–3.88), 2.30 (95% CI 0.97–3.63) and 1.30 (95% CI 0.03–2.57), respectively. This NMA demonstrates with a high level of evidence that nicotinamide 4%, clobetasol 0.05%, nicotinamide 2% and tacrolimus 0.1% are statistically significant topical agents for CLE. CLASI may be an appropriate outcome to evaluate drug efficacy in CLE.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Niacinamide, Clobetasol, Administration, Cutaneous, Severity of Illness Index, Tacrolimus, Treatment Outcome, Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous, Humans, Dermatologic Agents, Immunosuppressive Agents, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Top 10%
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!