
Abstract Introduction During the corona virus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, frontline units worldwide faced the challenging task of providing high-risk services (like surgical tracheostomy) while safe-guarding the very people performing the high risk procedures. The aim of our study was to assess the incidence of COVID-19 infection among staff involved in surgical tracheostomy on COVID-19 patients Method A surgical tracheostomy protocol and operation theatre modifications were put in place at our centre, dictated by local resources, staff availability and previous tracheostomy experience. Between 26/03/2020 and 27/05/2020, staff participating in 71 tracheostomy procedures were sent a questionnaire. The presence of COVID-19 symptoms (new onset continuous cough, fever, loss of taste and/or loss of smell) in tracheostomy staff and patient related data were analysed. Result Among the responders (72/122), compliance with personal prophylaxis equipment use was 100%. Eleven (15%,11/72) reported key COVID-19 symptoms and self-isolated. 10 had a COVID-19 swab test and three tested positive. One staff attended (1/72) hospital for symptomatic treatment, none required hospitalisation. 43/72 staff (60%) underwent a COVID-19 antibody test, 18.6% (8/43) were positive. Among the tracheostomised patients, the mean age was 58 years(29–78) and 65.5% were males. The median time from intubation to ST was 15 days (range 5–33, IQR = 9). There were no tracheostomy related deaths and overall mortality was 11%(6/55). Conclusion Safe delivery of tracheostomy during a pandemic like COVID-19 is possible with strict adherence to personnel protective equipment, surgical protocols and regulation of traffic flow in theatres to mitigate the potential transmission of COVID-19 among surgical staff. Take-home Message Compliance with PPE, adherence to tracheostomy protocol and local modifications can mitigate potential COVID-19 transmission among health care personnel.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
