Heuristics and Meta-heuristics in Scientific Judgement

Spencer Phillips Hey

Found an issue? Give us feedback

The British Journal ...arrow_drop_down

The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science

Article . 2016 . Peer-reviewed

Data sources: Crossref

https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjp...

Article

Data sources: Microsoft Academic Graph

Heuristics and Meta-heuristics in Scientific Judgement

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 01 Jun 2016 English Publisher:University of Chicago PressJournal:The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, volume 67, pages 471-495 (issn: 0007-0882, eissn: 1464-3537,

Copyright policy )

Authors: Spencer Phillips Hey;

doi: 10.1093/bjps/axu045

Heuristics and Meta-heuristics in Scientific Judgement

- Summary
- Metrics

Abstract

Abstract Despite the increasing recognition that heuristics may be involved in myriad scientific activities, much about how to use them prudently remains obscure. As typically defined, heuristics a...

Related Organizations

McGill University
Canada

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	18
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 10%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%