Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ British Journal of D...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
British Journal of Dermatology
Article . 2024 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY NC
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Treating epidermolytic ichthyosis and ichthyosis with confetti with epidermal autografts cultured from revertant skin

Authors: Kana Tanahashi; Michihiro Kono; Takenori Yoshikawa; Yuika Suzuki; Masukazu Inoie; Yachiyo Kuwatsuka; Fumie Kinoshita; +2 Authors

Treating epidermolytic ichthyosis and ichthyosis with confetti with epidermal autografts cultured from revertant skin

Abstract

Abstract Background No efficient treatment has yet been established for epidermolytic ichthyosis (EI), which is caused by pathogenic variants of KRT1 or KRT10. Patients with ichthyosis with confetti (IWC) have multiple normal-appearing spots, caused by the revertant somatic recombination of pathogenic variants that occurs at each spot independently. Additionally, some patients with EI have large areas of normal skin due to revertant postzygotic mosaicism. Objectives To assess the feasibility of transplanting cultured epidermal autografts (CEAs) produced from revertant epidermal keratinocytes in patients with EI and IWC. Methods We performed a clinical trial of treatment with CEAs produced from each patient’s own revertant epidermal keratinocytes as a proof-of-concept study. This was a single-arm, open, unmasked, uncontrolled, single-assignment, treatment-purpose study. The primary outcome was the percentage area that lacked recurrence of ichthyosis lesions 4 weeks after the final transplant. The secondary outcome was the percentage area lacking recurrence of ichthyosis lesions 24 weeks after the initial transplantation. The trial was registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTb041190097). Results We successfully produced CEAs from genetically confirmed revertant skin from two patients with mosaic EI and from one patient with IWC and confirmed by amplicon sequencing and droplet digital polymerase chain reaction analysis that the CEAs mainly consisted of revertant wild-type cells. Single-cell RNA sequencing analysis confirmed the normal proliferation and safety profiling of CEAs. CEAs were transplanted onto desquamated lesional sites in the patients. Four weeks post-transplantation, the percentage area lacking recurrence of ichthyosis lesions in the three patients was 40%, 100% and 100% respectively, although recurrence of ichthyosis lesions was seen at the site of CEA transplantation in all three patients at 24 weeks post-transplantation. Conclusions CEAs from normal skin have the potential to be a safe and local treatment option for EI and IWC.

Keywords

Male, Keratinocytes, Adult, Hyperkeratosis, Epidermolytic, Adolescent, Mosaicism, Skin Transplantation, Keratin-10, Proof of Concept Study, Transplantation, Autologous, Young Adult, Treatment Outcome, Child, Preschool, Humans, Feasibility Studies, Female, Epidermis, Child, Autografts, Keratin-1

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
hybrid