
doi: 10.1093/bja/80.1.53
pmid: 9505778
We conducted a two-part controlled study to evaluate the efficacy of preoperative oral pirenzepine (muscarinic receptor antagonist known to inhibit gastric secretion), ranitidine, and the combination pirenzepine-ranitidine in controlling gastric fluid pH and volume in 210 ASA I children, aged 2-14 yr, undergoing elective surgery. In the first part of the study (n = 90), the proportion of children considered at risk for aspiration pneumonitis was reduced with pirenzepine 25 mg (P < 0.05) but not with 12.5 mg. In the second part of the study, the other 120 children were allocated randomly to one of four groups: pirenzepine 25 mg with placebo; ranitidine 75 mg with placebo; pirenzepine 25 mg with ranitidine 75 mg; and placebo and placebo. These medications were administered 1 h before anaesthesia. After tracheal intubation, volume and pH of the gastric fluid aspiration via a multiorifice orogastric tube were measured. Pirenzepine 25 mg decreased gastric fluid volume (P < 0.05) but failed to increase gastric pH. Ranitidine 75 mg increased gastric pH (P < 0.05) but failed to decrease fluid volume. The pirenzepine-ranitidine combination reduced gastric fluid acidity and volume (P < 0.05).
Gastric Juice, Adolescent, Gastric Acidity Determination, Muscarinic Antagonists, Pirenzepine, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Pneumonia, Aspiration, Ranitidine, Gastric Acid, Drug Combinations, Postoperative Complications, Histamine H2 Antagonists, Child, Preschool, Humans, Child, Preanesthetic Medication
Gastric Juice, Adolescent, Gastric Acidity Determination, Muscarinic Antagonists, Pirenzepine, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Pneumonia, Aspiration, Ranitidine, Gastric Acid, Drug Combinations, Postoperative Complications, Histamine H2 Antagonists, Child, Preschool, Humans, Child, Preanesthetic Medication
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 10 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
