<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
pmid: 8679346
We have studied 120 infants and children, in three age groups (3-11 months, 1-5 yr and 6-15 yr), to compare anaesthesia with sevoflurane or halothane for bronchoscopy or gastroscopy, or both. Premedication or i.v. anaesthetic agents were not used. Patients were allocated randomly to receive either 7% sevoflurane or 3% halothane in 66% nitrous oxide in oxygen for induction of anaesthesia. The same inspired mixture was continued during bronchoscopy while the concentration of the inhalation agent was reduced by 50% during gastroscopy. Induction times were shorter for infants than for children and shorter for sevoflurane than for halothane. Cardiac arrhythmias were significantly more frequent during halothane than during sevoflurane anaesthesia. Physiological and psychomotor recovery were more rapid after sevoflurane than after halothane. At 24-h follow-up, children who received sevoflurane had significantly less nausea and vomiting. We conclude that sevoflurane was superior to halothane for paediatric bronchoscopy and gastroscopy.
Male, Methyl Ethers, Adolescent, Nitrous Oxide, Infant, Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Sevoflurane, Child, Preschool, Anesthesia Recovery Period, Anesthetics, Inhalation, Bronchoscopy, Gastroscopy, Humans, Female, Anesthesia, Inhalation, Child, Halothane, Ethers, Follow-Up Studies
Male, Methyl Ethers, Adolescent, Nitrous Oxide, Infant, Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Sevoflurane, Child, Preschool, Anesthesia Recovery Period, Anesthetics, Inhalation, Bronchoscopy, Gastroscopy, Humans, Female, Anesthesia, Inhalation, Child, Halothane, Ethers, Follow-Up Studies
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 111 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |