
doi: 10.1093/bja/75.2.186
pmid: 7577252
We have attempted to define some of the patterns of expression of the IEG Fos in pain-related states. On one level, Fos may be used simply as marker of afferent stimulation and disease state, and in this respect Fos activation may be a useful tool after nociceptive stimulation to examine the effectiveness of different analgesic regimens. For example, certain analgesics such as opioids, alpha 2 agonists and local anaesthetics are more effective when given pre-emptively or early in the injury rather than later on. Furthermore, the persistent expression of Fos in the presence of high dose pre-emptive opioids is disturbing and yet it may explain variable success of studies attempting to show pre-emptive analgesia with opioid-based analgesic regimens. We suggest that Fos expression, as well as defining the magnitude and the duration of insult to the spinal cord seems also to signal the adaptive responses of the nervous system to nociceptive insult. Though we have focused on only one IEG, c-fos, and attempted to relate appearance to known functional changes within the spinal cord, there are in fact many more genes known to be upregulated with the same or slower kinetics (e.g. Fos B, FRA-1, FRA-2, Jun B, Jun D, NGFI-A). Increased understanding of the role of these genes is likely to lead to many novel targets in the search for normalization or restoration of spinal cord function in pain states and after nerve injury.
Analgesics, Nociceptors, Pain, Rats, Spinal Cord, Acute Disease, Chronic Disease, Animals, Humans, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-fos, Biomarkers
Analgesics, Nociceptors, Pain, Rats, Spinal Cord, Acute Disease, Chronic Disease, Animals, Humans, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-fos, Biomarkers
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 104 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
